Google Pixel 6 Pro Vs. Google Pixel 6a

Here’s the detailed comparison between the Google Pixel 6 Pro and the Google Pixel 6a:

The Google Pixel 6 Pro was released in October 2021.
The Google Pixel 6a was released in July 2022.

             

Feature Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Pixel 6a Key Difference
Display 6.71-inch LTPO AMOLED, 1440 x 3120 pixels (~512 ppi), 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 1000 nits (peak), Gorilla Glass Victus 6.1-inch OLED, 1080 x 2400 pixels (~429 ppi), 60Hz, HDR, Gorilla Glass 3 Pixel 6 Pro has a larger, higher resolution (QHD+) display with a smoother 120Hz refresh rate and superior brightness.
Brightness 800 nits (HBM), 1000 nits (peak) Not explicitly stated (typically lower than Pro models) Pixel 6 Pro offers significantly higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility.
Processor Google Tensor (5 nm) Google Tensor (5 nm) Both phones feature the same flagship Google Tensor chip, offering identical high-end performance.
RAM 12GB 6GB Pixel 6 Pro has double the RAM, which can be beneficial for heavy multitasking and future-proofing.
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB (UFS 3.1) 128GB (UFS 3.1) Pixel 6 Pro offers more storage options, while 6a is limited to 128GB.
Battery Life 5003 mAh 4410 mAh Pixel 6 Pro has a larger battery, but its larger, higher-resolution, and higher-refresh-rate display can consume more power. Real-world battery life can be similar or slightly better on 6a.
Rear Camera 50 MP (wide, f/1.9, OIS, Laser AF, Dual Pixel PDAF) + 48 MP (telephoto, f/3.5, OIS, PDAF, 4x optical zoom) + 12 MP (ultrawide, f/2.2) 12.2 MP (wide, f/1.7, OIS, Dual Pixel PDAF) + 12 MP (ultrawide, f/2.2) Pixel 6 Pro has a significantly more versatile and higher-spec camera system, including a dedicated 4x optical telephoto lens and higher resolution main sensor.
Front Camera 11.1 MP (ultrawide, f/2.2) 8 MP (wide, f/2.0) Pixel 6 Pro has a higher resolution ultrawide front camera.
Build Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, IP68 dust/water resistant Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame, IP67 dust/water resistant Pixel 6 Pro has a more premium build with Gorilla Glass Victus on both sides and superior IP68 water/dust resistance.
Water Resistance IP68 (dust/water resistant up to 1.5m for 30 min) IP67 (dust/water resistant up to 1m for 30 min) Pixel 6 Pro offers better water and dust resistance.
S Pen No No Neither phone includes S Pen support.
Software Android 12 (upgradeable to Android 14+), Pure Android experience Android 12 (upgradeable to Android 14+), Pure Android experience Both run Google’s clean Android experience and receive timely updates. Pixel 6a launched later, so it might receive support for a slightly longer duration.
Charging 23W wired, 23W wireless, Reverse wireless 18W wired Pixel 6 Pro offers faster wired charging, plus convenient wireless and reverse wireless charging, which 6a lacks.
Special Features 120Hz LTPO display, Telephoto camera, Wireless charging, Reverse wireless charging, IP68, Higher RAM/Storage options More compact size, More affordable, Excellent camera performance (for its price), Same Tensor chip as Pro Pixel 6 Pro has more premium features. Pixel 6a offers flagship performance in a smaller, more budget-friendly package.
Price KES 43,500 – 52,500 (approx.) KES 40,000 (approx.) Pixel 6a was significantly more affordable at launch. Current prices vary due to age.

My Choice and Why:

The Google Pixel 6 Pro and Pixel 6a offer a distinct choice between a full-fledged flagship and a highly capable mid-range device, both powered by the same impressive Tensor chip.
The Google Pixel 6 Pro is the superior phone if you prioritize premium features and an uncompromised experience. Its stunning QHD+ 120Hz LTPO display, versatile camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens, more RAM, premium build with IP68 rating, and wireless charging capabilities make it a true flagship. If you want the best of Google’s hardware and don’t mind spending more, the Pro model is the way to go.

The Google Pixel 6a is an incredible value proposition, especially for its price. It delivers flagship performance thanks to the Tensor chip, excellent camera quality (despite having fewer lenses than the Pro), and a more compact form factor. If you want a pure Google Android experience with fantastic camera performance, a great main chip, and long software support, but at a significantly lower cost, the 6a is an outstanding choice. It’s truly a “budget flagship” in terms of core performance and camera.

I’d say:

* Choose the Google Pixel 6 Pro if your budget allows for a top-tier display, advanced camera versatility, wireless charging, and the highest build quality.
* Choose the Google Pixel 6a if you want the core Pixel experience (Tensor chip performance, excellent main camera, clean Android) at a much more affordable price, and a more compact size, without needing a high refresh rate display or telephoto lens.

https://yesgadgets.co.ke/google-pixel-6-p…-google-pixel-6a/

OnePlus 12R Vs. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

Here’s a detailed comparison between the OnePlus 12R and the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra:

The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra was a flagship device launched in August 2020.
The OnePlus 12R is a more recent “flagship killer” device, launched in January 2024.

       

Feature OnePlus 12R Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra Key Difference
Display 6.78-inch AMOLED, 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi), 120Hz, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak), Gorilla Glass Victus 2 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 1440 x 3088 pixels (~496 ppi), 120Hz (at FHD+), HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak), Gorilla Glass Victus Note 20 Ultra has a larger, higher resolution (QHD+) display with slightly higher pixel density. OnePlus 12R has significantly higher peak brightness. Both support 120Hz.
Brightness 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) 1500 nits (peak) OnePlus 12R has a much higher peak brightness, making it vastly superior for outdoor visibility and HDR content.
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Exynos 990 (7 nm+) or Snapdragon 865+ (7 nm+) The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the OnePlus 12R is a significantly newer and more powerful flagship-grade processor compared to the older Exynos 990/Snapdragon 865+ in the Note 20 Ultra, offering superior performance and efficiency.
RAM 8GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB Both offer high RAM options, with OnePlus 12R having a higher maximum.
Storage 128GB (UFS 3.1) / 256GB / 512GB (UFS 4.0 for higher variants) 128GB / 256GB / 512GB (UFS 3.0) + microSDXC slot Note 20 Ultra offers expandable storage via microSDXC, which OnePlus 12R lacks. OnePlus 12R uses newer, faster UFS 4.0 storage in its higher variants.
Battery Life 5500 mAh 4500 mAh OnePlus 12R has a significantly larger battery capacity.
Rear Camera 50MP (wide, f/1.8, OIS, Sony IMX890) + 8MP (ultrawide, f/2.2) + 2MP (macro, f/2.4) 108MP (wide, f/1.8, OIS, PDAF, Laser AF) + 12MP (periscope telephoto, f/3.0, 5x optical zoom, OIS) + 12MP (ultrawide, f/2.2) Note 20 Ultra has a more versatile and advanced camera system with a 108MP main sensor, dedicated periscope telephoto lens for 5x optical zoom, and Laser AF. OnePlus 12R has a very capable main sensor (IMX890) but lacks a dedicated telephoto.
Front Camera 16MP (wide, f/2.4) 10MP (wide, f/2.2, Dual Pixel PDAF) Both have decent front cameras, with OnePlus 12R having a slightly higher megapixel count.
Build Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back, IP64 dust/splash resistant Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), stainless steel frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), IP68 dust/water resistant Note 20 Ultra has a more premium build with a stainless steel frame and superior IP68 water/dust resistance.
Water Resistance IP64 (dust and splash resistant) IP68 (dust/water resistant up to 1.5m for 30 min) Note 20 Ultra offers full flagship-level water and dust resistance.
S Pen No Yes Note 20 Ultra’s signature feature is the integrated S Pen with ultra-low latency, offering unique productivity features.
Software Android 14, OxygenOS 14 Android 10 (upgradeable to Android 13), One UI OnePlus 12R launches with a much newer Android version and will receive more major updates. Note 20 Ultra has reached its end of major software updates.
Charging 100W wired (SuperVOOC), 0-100% in 26 min 25W wired, 15W wireless, 4.5W reverse wireless OnePlus 12R offers significantly faster wired charging. Note 20 Ultra provides versatile wireless and reverse wireless charging.
Special Features Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Super-fast 100W charging, Large 5500 mAh battery, High peak brightness, IP64 rating, Stereo speakers S Pen, MicroSD slot, Dedicated periscope telephoto camera (5x optical zoom), IP68 rating, Wireless/reverse wireless charging, DeX support, Ultrasonic under-display fingerprint Note 20 Ultra has a unique feature set centered around the S Pen and its advanced camera zoom. OnePlus 12R focuses on raw performance, battery, and charging speed.
Price KES 55,000 (approx.) KES 35,000 – 56,500 (approx.) The current market price can vary significantly. Note 20 Ultra is an older flagship, so its price depends on its condition (new old stock, used, refurbished).

My Choice and Why:

This is a fascinating comparison between a powerful, newer “flagship killer” and an older, full-fledged flagship. Your choice heavily depends on whether you prioritize modern performance and battery/charging, or a more versatile, feature-rich (but older) experience.

The OnePlus 12R is the clear winner for raw performance, battery life, and charging speed. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor is significantly more powerful and efficient, making it much better for demanding games and long-term use. The 100W charging is incredibly fast, and it runs on a much newer Android version with more updates to come.

The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra was a true powerhouse in its day, and it still offers unique advantages. Its S Pen is unmatched for productivity and creativity. The camera system is more versatile with a dedicated periscope zoom lens and a higher resolution main sensor (though not always better for general shots). The IP68 rating and wireless charging are also premium features. However, it’s an older device, meaning its software support has largely ended, and its battery life and performance will be noticeably behind the 12R.

I’d say:

* Choose the OnePlus 12R if top-tier performance (especially for gaming), excellent battery endurance, blazing-fast charging, and long-term software updates are your main priorities. It provides a more modern and future-proof experience.
* Choose the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra if the S Pen functionality, advanced camera versatility (especially optical zoom), and premium features like IP68 rating and wireless charging are essential to you, and you are comfortable with an older device that has reached its end of software support. Be sure to find one in good condition.

https://yesgadgets.co.ke/oneplus-12r-vs-s…xy-note-20-ultra/

Vivo V50 Vs. Samsung Galaxy A56 5G

Here’s the detailed comparison between the Vivo V50 and the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G:

The Vivo V50 5G was announced on February 17, 2025, and released on February 25, 2025.
The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G was announced on March 2, 2025, and released on March 2, 2025 (UK: March 19, 2025).

     

Feature Vivo V50 5G Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Key Difference
Display 6.77-inch AMOLED, 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi), 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak), Diamond Shield Glass 6.7-inch Super AMOLED, 1080 x 2340 pixels (~385 ppi), 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak), Gorilla Glass Victus+ Both offer excellent 120Hz AMOLED displays with high brightness and durable glass. Vivo V50 has a significantly higher peak brightness (4500 nits vs 1900 nits) and a slightly larger screen.
Brightness 1300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) Vivo V50 boasts a much higher peak brightness, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight.
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) Exynos 1580 (4 nm) Both are modern 4nm processors. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and Exynos 1580 are mid-range to upper-mid-range chipsets, offering strong performance for daily tasks and gaming. Performance difference would be marginal in real-world usage without direct benchmarks.
RAM 8GB / 12GB 6GB / 8GB / 12GB Vivo V50 starts with 8GB RAM and offers up to 12GB. Samsung A56 also offers up to 12GB RAM.
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB (UFS 2.2) 128GB / 256GB (UFS 3.1) Vivo V50 offers more storage options, including 512GB. Samsung A56 uses faster UFS 3.1 storage. Neither has a card slot.
Battery Life 6000 mAh (Si/C) 5000 mAh Vivo V50 has a significantly larger 6000 mAh battery, promising much longer battery life.
Rear Camera Dual: 50 MP (wide, OIS, PDAF, Zeiss optics) + 50 MP (ultrawide, AF) Triple: 50 MP (wide, OIS, PDAF) + 12 MP (ultrawide) + 5 MP (macro) Vivo V50 offers two 50MP main and ultrawide cameras with OIS, AF on ultrawide, and Zeiss optics. Samsung A56 has a versatile triple camera setup with a 50MP main (OIS), 12MP ultrawide, and 5MP macro. Vivo’s ultrawide is higher resolution and has AF.
Front Camera 50 MP (wide, AF) 12 MP (wide) Vivo V50 has a much higher resolution 50MP front camera with autofocus.
Build Glass front, glass back or plastic back, IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (high pressure water jets) Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame, IP67 dust/water resistant Vivo V50 has a higher IP68/IP69 rating for more robust water and dust resistance, and some variants have a glass back. Samsung A56 has a premium aluminum frame and Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both front and back, with IP67 rating.
Water Resistance IP68/IP69 (dust tight and water resistant, high pressure water jets; immersible up to 1.5m for 30 min) IP67 (dust/water resistant up to 1m for 30 min) Vivo V50 offers superior water resistance, including protection against high-pressure water jets.
S Pen No No Neither phone includes S Pen support.
Software Android 15, Funtouch 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, 4 years security patches Android 15, One UI 7, up to 6 major Android upgrades, up to 6 years security updates Samsung Galaxy A56 5G offers significantly longer software support with up to 6 major Android upgrades and 6 years of security updates.
Charging 90W wired, Reverse wired 45W wired, 65% in 30 min, 100% in 68 min Vivo V50 offers significantly faster wired charging.
Special Features 6000 mAh battery, 90W charging, IP68/IP69 rating, Zeiss optics, High-resolution ultrawide camera with AF, High peak brightness, Stereo speakers IP67 rating, Longest software support in class, Premium build (Gorilla Glass Victus+ front/back, aluminum frame), Stereo speakers, Under-display fingerprint sensor, Circle to Search Vivo focuses on battery, charging speed, and camera versatility/optics. Samsung emphasizes long-term software support and premium build materials for its price point.
Price (Launch) KES 61,500 (approx.) KES 43,500.00 – 49,000 (approx.) Samsung Galaxy A56 5G is generally more affordable at launch.

My Choice and Why:

Both the Vivo V50 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G are strong contenders in the upper mid-range segment, offering compelling features. The choice largely depends on your priorities.

The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G excels in its commitment to long-term software support, promising an industry-leading 6 major Android upgrades and 6 years of security updates, which ensures excellent longevity. It also boasts a very premium build with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both sides and an aluminum frame, along with a reliable IP67 water/dust resistance. Its display is top-tier, and the camera system is versatile.

The Vivo V50 5G, however, offers a truly remarkable battery experience with its massive 6000 mAh battery and incredibly fast 90W charging. Its display gets significantly brighter in peak conditions, and the camera system, with its dual 50MP sensors (including an ultrawide with AF) and Zeiss optics, has the potential for excellent photography. The higher IP68/IP69 rating also provides superior protection.

I’d say:

* Choose the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G if software longevity, a premium and durable build, and a balanced overall experience with robust support are your primary concerns. It offers excellent value for a phone that will last for years with the latest features.
* Choose the Vivo V50 5G if battery life, charging speed, cutting-edge display brightness, and an advanced camera system (especially the high-res ultrawide and Zeiss optics) are more critical to your daily usage. It’s built for power users who need their phone to last and charge quickly.

 

https://yesgadgets.co.ke/vivo-v50-vs-samsung-galaxy-a56-5g/

Samsung Galaxy S20 Fe 5G Vs. Samsung Galaxy M35 5G

Here’s a detailed comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G and the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G:

The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G was launched in September 2020, making it a few years old but still a popular choice for its flagship-level features at a more accessible price.
The Samsung Galaxy M35 5G is a much newer device, launched in April 2024, targeting the mid-range segment with a focus on battery life.

         

Feature Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Samsung Galaxy M35 5G Key Difference
Display 6.5-inch Super AMOLED, 1080 x 2400 pixels (~407 ppi), 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 6.6-inch Super AMOLED, 1080 x 2340 pixels (~390 ppi), 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) Both offer excellent 120Hz Super AMOLED displays with high brightness. M35 5G has a slightly larger screen and higher peak brightness.
Brightness 1200 nits (peak) 1000 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) Galaxy M35 5G offers significantly higher peak brightness, especially beneficial for outdoor visibility and HDR content.
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm) The Snapdragon 865 was a flagship processor from 2020, offering very strong performance. The Exynos 1380 is a competent mid-range processor from 2023. S20 FE 5G generally has a more powerful processor.
RAM 6GB / 8GB 6GB / 8GB Both phones offer similar RAM configurations.
Storage 128GB / 256GB (UFS 3.1) 128GB / 256GB Both offer similar storage options, but S20 FE 5G uses faster UFS 3.1 storage.
Battery Life 4500 mAh 6000 mAh Galaxy M35 5G has a significantly larger battery capacity, offering potentially much longer battery life.
Rear Camera 12MP (wide, f/1.8, OIS, Dual Pixel PDAF) + 8MP (telephoto, f/2.4, OIS, 3x optical zoom) + 12MP (ultrawide, f/2.2) 50MP (wide, f/1.8, OIS, PDAF) + 8MP (ultrawide, f/2.2) + 2MP (macro, f/2.4) S20 FE 5G has a more versatile camera setup with a dedicated 3x optical zoom telephoto lens, offering better zoom capabilities and a generally more mature camera system. M35 5G has a higher megapixel count for its main sensor.
Front Camera 32MP (wide, f/2.2) 13MP (wide, f/2.2) S20 FE 5G has a much higher resolution front camera.
Build Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame, IP68 dust/water resistant Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame, No official IP rating stated S20 FE 5G features a premium aluminum frame and superior IP68 dust/water resistance. M35 5G has stronger Gorilla Glass 5 on the front.
Water Resistance IP68 (dust/water resistant up to 1.5m for 30 min) Not officially stated (likely none) S20 FE 5G offers full flagship-level water and dust resistance.
S Pen No No Neither phone includes S Pen support.
Software Android 10 (upgradeable to Android 13/14), One UI Android 14, One UI 6.1 M35 5G launches with a much newer Android version and will receive more major Android updates moving forward due to its recent launch. S20 FE 5G has reached its end of major software updates.
Charging 25W wired, 15W wireless, 4.5W reverse wireless 25W wired S20 FE 5G offers versatile charging options including wireless and reverse wireless charging, which M35 5G lacks. Both have 25W wired charging.
Special Features IP68 rating, Wireless charging, Telephoto camera, Snapdragon 865, Stereo speakers, DeX support Huge 6000 mAh battery, Newer Android version, Higher peak brightness, Quad speakers S20 FE 5G has more “flagship” features like IP68, wireless charging, and DeX. M35 5G’s highlight is its massive battery.
Price KES 24,000 (approx.) KES 21,200 (approx.) The current market price can vary significantly. M35 5G is typically available new in the mid-range. S20 FE 5G is an older model, so its price depends on its condition (new old stock, used, refurbished).

My Choice and Why:

This is an interesting comparison between an older “flagship killer” and a newer mid-range device with a key focus on battery. Your choice heavily depends on your priorities:
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Fan Edition) was designed to bring flagship features to a wider audience. It still holds up incredibly well with its powerful Snapdragon 865 processor, excellent and versatile camera system (especially the telephoto lens), IP68 water/dust resistance, and convenient wireless charging. If you can find it in good condition at a competitive price, it offers a premium experience, especially in performance and camera versatility. However, it’s at the end of its major software update cycle, meaning you won’t get new Android versions.

The Samsung Galaxy M35 5G, on the other hand, is a fresh contender with a focus on longevity. Its standout feature is the colossal 6000 mAh battery, promising exceptional endurance. It also benefits from launching with the latest Android 14 and will receive more major updates than the S20 FE. The display is excellent, and the main camera has OIS. If battery life, guaranteed software updates, and a modern Android experience are your top priorities, this is the better choice.

I’d say:
* Choose the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G if you prioritize raw performance (for gaming/heavy tasks), a more versatile camera with optical zoom, water resistance and wireless charging, and don’t mind an older software base that won’t receive future Android version upgrades. Look for good deals on new old stock or refurbished units.
* Choose the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G if you need exceptional battery life, want the absolute latest Android version with a longer update promise and a robust main camera with OIS, all while keeping within a solid mid-range budget. It’s a pragmatic choice for everyday reliability and longevity.

https://yesgadgets.co.ke/samsung-galaxy-s…ng-galaxy-m35-5g/

Samsung Galaxy A16 4G Vs. Tecno Camon 30s

Here’s the detailed comparison between the Samsung Galaxy A16 and the Tecno Camon 30s:

     

Feature Samsung Galaxy A16 5G Tecno Camon 30S Key Difference
Display 6.7-inch Super AMOLED, 1080 x 2340 pixels (~385 ppi), 90Hz 6.78-inch AMOLED, 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi), 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Tecno Camon 30S offers a slightly larger display with a higher 120Hz refresh rate and Gorilla Glass protection for better durability and smoother visuals.
Brightness 800 nits (HBM), 824 nits (peak measured) 1300 nits (HBM) Tecno Camon 30S boasts significantly higher typical brightness, offering better outdoor visibility.
Processor Exynos 1330 (5 nm) or Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) Octa-core Mediatek Helio G100 (6 nm) Octa-core Both are mid-range processors. Performance differences would require detailed benchmarks, but they are comparable in their segment.
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 6GB / 8GB Both offer comparable RAM options, catering to multi-tasking needs.
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB Both offer the same storage options.
Battery Life 5000 mAh 5000 mAh Both phones feature the same large 5000 mAh battery capacity, suggesting similar battery longevity.
Rear Camera 50 MP (wide, AF) + 5 MP (ultrawide) + 2 MP (macro) 50 MP (wide, PDAF, OIS) + 2 MP (depth) + Auxiliary lens Tecno Camon 30S includes Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on its main 50MP camera, which is a significant advantage for sharper photos and more stable videos, especially in challenging conditions. Samsung has an ultrawide which Tecno doesn’t specify for the 30S.
Front Camera 13 MP (wide) 13 MP Both offer comparable 13MP front cameras.
Build Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame, IP54 dust/splash resistant IP53 dust/splash resistant, Corning Gorilla Glass front Samsung Galaxy A16 has a slightly better IP54 rating for dust/splash resistance. Tecno Camon 30S specifies Gorilla Glass for display protection.
Water Resistance IP54 (dust and splash resistant) IP53 (dust and splash resistant) Samsung Galaxy A16 has a slightly higher dust/splash resistance rating.
S Pen No No Neither phone includes S Pen support.
Software Android 14, One UI 6.1, up to 6 major Android upgrades Android 14, HIOS 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades Samsung Galaxy A16 offers significantly longer software support with up to 6 major Android upgrades, ensuring better longevity and security updates.
Charging 25W wired 33W wired (0-100% in 45 min) Tecno Camon 30S offers faster charging speeds.
Special Features Super AMOLED display, Side-mounted fingerprint, long software support AMOLED 120Hz display, OIS on main camera, In-display fingerprint sensor, Dual speakers, Infrared port, Gorilla Glass Tecno Camon 30S offers a smoother display, OIS for camera, faster charging, and a more premium in-display fingerprint sensor. Samsung’s long software support is a major differentiator.
Price KES 25,500 (approx.) KES 24,100 (approx.) Both are budget-friendly options, with the Samsung Galaxy A16 generally being slightly more affordable.

My Choice and Why:

Both the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G and the Tecno Camon 30S are strong contenders in the budget to lower-mid-range segment, offering compelling features for their price points.
For users who prioritize long-term software support, a vibrant Super AMOLED display, and a slightly higher IP rating, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G stands out. Samsung’s commitment to up to 6 major Android upgrades is exceptional in this price category, providing peace of mind for future updates and security.

However, if your priorities lean towards a smoother display experience (120Hz), faster charging, optical image stabilization (OIS) for better camera performance, and a more modern in-display fingerprint sensor, the Tecno Camon 30S offers a more feature-rich experience out of the box. Its higher display brightness is also a plus for outdoor use.

I’d say:
* Choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G if software longevity and a reliable brand with extensive update promises are paramount to you.
* Opt for the Tecno Camon 30S if you prefer a smoother screen, quicker charging, and enhanced camera stability (OIS), even with a shorter software update commitment.

https://yesgadgets.co.ke/samsung-galaxy-a…-tecno-camon-30s/

Honor X9C 5G Vs. OnePlus 12R

Here’s a detailed comparison between the Honor X9c 5G and the OnePlus 12R:

   

Feature Honor X9c 5G OnePlus 12R Key Difference
Display 6.78-inch AMOLED, 1220 x 2652 pixels (~430 ppi), 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) 6.78-inch AMOLED, 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi), 120Hz, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) Both have excellent AMOLED displays with 120Hz, but the OnePlus 12R boasts significantly higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility and HDR content.
Brightness 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) OnePlus 12R has a much higher peak brightness, making it superior for HDR and bright environments.
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) The OnePlus 12R has a flagship-grade processor from the previous generation, offering significantly higher performance than the Honor X9c 5G’s mid-range Snapdragon 6 Gen 1.
RAM 8GB / 12GB 8GB / 16GB Both offer good RAM options, with OnePlus 12R having a higher maximum.
Storage 256GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB OnePlus 12R offers more storage options, including a 512GB variant, and its 256GB variant typically uses faster UFS 3.1 or 4.0 storage.
Battery Life 5800 mAh 5500 mAh Honor X9c 5G has a slightly larger battery capacity.
Rear Camera 108MP (wide, OIS) + 8MP (ultrawide) + 2MP (macro) 50MP (wide, OIS, Sony IMX890) + 8MP (ultrawide) + 2MP (macro) While the Honor X9c 5G has a higher megapixel count, the OnePlus 12R uses a larger, more capable sensor (Sony IMX890) with OIS, which generally translates to better image quality, especially in low light.
Front Camera 16MP 16MP Both have comparable 16MP front cameras.
Build Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back. IP53 dust/splash resistant. Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back. IP64 dust/splash resistant. OnePlus 12R uses premium materials (glass front/back, aluminum frame) and has a slightly better IP64 rating compared to Honor X9c 5G’s plastic build and IP53 rating.
Water Resistance IP53 (dust and splash resistant) IP64 (dust and splash resistant) OnePlus 12R offers a higher degree of dust and splash resistance.
Software Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 Android 14, OxygenOS 14 OnePlus 12R launches with a newer Android version and typically offers faster updates.
Charging 35W wired 100W wired (SuperVOOC) OnePlus 12R offers significantly faster charging speed.
Special Features Curved AMOLED display, OIS on main camera, large battery, IP53 Premium build, powerful processor, faster charging, higher peak display brightness, OIS, IP64 OnePlus 12R offers a more premium experience with a top-tier processor, faster charging, and better build/water resistance.
Price KES 46,500 (approx.) KES 55,000 (approx.) The OnePlus 12R is generally in a higher price bracket compared to the Honor X9c 5G.

My Choice and Why:

Considering your interest in mid-range phones, both devices are good options, but they cater to slightly different segments within the mid-range category.
The Honor X9c 5G is an excellent choice for users who prioritize a very large battery, a high-resolution main camera (though megapixel count doesn’t tell the whole story), and a stylish curved display, all at a more budget-friendly mid-range price. It offers a solid overall experience for everyday use and media consumption.

However, the OnePlus 12R stands out as the stronger contender if you’re looking for a “premium mid-range” or “flagship killer” experience. Its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor provides superior performance for gaming and demanding applications. The faster 100W charging, higher quality display with extreme peak brightness, and premium build materials with better IP rating contribute to a much more refined user experience. The main camera, while 50MP, utilizes a better sensor (Sony IMX890) which often results in superior photos compared to higher megapixel but smaller sensors.

I’d say: If your budget is tighter and you want a reliable phone with great battery life and a good screen for general use, the Honor X9c 5G is a fantastic value. But, if you’re willing to spend more for significantly better performance, a more premium feel, faster charging, and an overall more polished experience, the OnePlus 12R is undeniably the superior choice and offers a better “mid-range” experience that borders on flagship performance.

https://yesgadgets.co.ke/honor-x9c-5g-vs-oneplus-12r/

Samsung Galaxy M16 5G Vs. Redmi Note 14

Here’s the detailed comparison table for the Samsung Galaxy M16 5G, Redmi Note 14 4G, and Redmi Note 14 5G, highlighting their key differences.

Feature Samsung Galaxy M16 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
Display 6.7-inch Super AMOLED, 1080 x 2340 pixels (~385 ppi), 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) 6.67-inch AMOLED, 1080 x 2400 pixels (~395 ppi), 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) 6.67-inch AMOLED, 1080 x 2400 pixels (~395 ppi), 120Hz, HDR10+, 2100 nits (peak)
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) MediaTek Helio G99 Ultra (6 nm) MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra (6 nm)
RAM & Storage 4GB / 6GB / 8GB RAM, 128GB / 256GB storage (microSDXC uses shared SIM slot) 6GB / 8GB RAM, 128GB / 256GB storage (microSDXC slot) 6GB / 8GB RAM, 128GB / 256GB storage (microSDXC uses shared SIM slot)
Battery Life 5000 mAh 5500 mAh 5110 mAh
Charging 25W wired 33W turbo charging 45W wired
Rear Camera Triple: 50MP (wide, f/1.8, AF) + 5MP (ultrawide) + 2MP (macro) Triple: 108MP (wide, f/1.7, PDAF) + 2MP (macro) + 2MP (depth) Triple: 50MP (wide, f/1.5, PDAF, OIS) + 8MP (ultrawide) + 2MP (macro)
Front Camera 13MP (wide, f/2.0) 20MP (f/2.2) 20MP (wide, f/2.2)
Build Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame, IP54 dust/splash resistant Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, IP54 dust/splash resistant Glass front, plastic back, IP64 dust/water resistant
Software Android 15, One UI 7, up to 6 major Android upgrades Android 14, HyperOS, up to 4 major Android upgrades Android 14, HyperOS, 2 years OS updates & 4 years security updates (likely up to Android 16)
Connectivity 5G, Wi-Fi 5 (ac), Bluetooth 5.3, NFC, USB-C 2.0 4G, Wi-Fi 5 (ac), Bluetooth 5.3, NFC, Infrared port, USB-C 2.0, 3.5mm jack 5G, Wi-Fi 5 (ac), Bluetooth 5.3, NFC, Infrared port, USB-C 2.0, 3.5mm jack, FM Radio
Audio Loudspeaker (no 3.5mm jack) Stereo speakers, 3.5mm jack, Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res audio Stereo speakers, 3.5mm jack, Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res audio
Special Features 90Hz Super AMOLED, IP54, 5G, excellent software longevity 120Hz AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, IP54, 108MP camera, Infrared, 3.5mm jack, Stereo speakers 120Hz AMOLED, IP64, 5G, OIS camera, Infrared, 3.5mm jack, Stereo speakers, faster charging
Price (Launch in Kenya) KES 18,300 – KSh 20,000 KES 21,100.00 – KSh 25,500 KES 21,500 and KES 26,000  (approx., speculative)

My Choice and Why:

This is a very close call, as all three phones are strong contenders in the mid-range segment, each with distinct advantages.
If software longevity and a classic Samsung AMOLED experience are paramount, choose the Samsung Galaxy M16 5G.
* Pros: The most impressive software upgrade promise (up to 6 major Android upgrades), Android 15 out of the box, Super AMOLED display (though 90Hz), 5G connectivity, IP54 rating.
* Cons: No 3.5mm jack, no stereo speakers, charging speed is average compared to Redmi, 90Hz refresh rate is lower than the Redmi Note 14 series.

If you prioritize the absolute best display for the price, a very high-resolution main camera (108MP), and don’t strictly need 5G, go for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G.
* Pros: 120Hz AMOLED display with excellent brightness, 108MP main camera, larger battery (5500mAh), stereo speakers, 3.5mm jack, IP54 rating, Infrared port.
* Cons: Limited to 4G, older Android 14 out of the box compared to M16, software update promise is good but not as extensive as Samsung’s.

If you want a balanced package with 5G, a very smooth display, OIS on the camera, and fast charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G is the stronger choice.
* Pros: 5G connectivity, 120Hz AMOLED display with very high peak brightness, OIS on the main camera (critical for better photos/videos), fastest charging (45W), stereo speakers, 3.5mm jack, IP64 rating, Infrared port.
* Cons: Launches with Android 14 (not the absolute latest), software update promise is decent but not as long as Samsung’s.

Overall Recommendation:

For the most future-proof and feature-rich experience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G generally offers the best all-around package due to its 5G, 120Hz AMOLED, OIS camera, and fast charging. However, if Samsung’s exceptional 6-year software update policy is your absolute top priority and you value that longevity above all else, the Samsung Galaxy M16 5G becomes highly compelling. If you’re on a tighter budget and 5G isn’t a must-have, the Redmi Note 14 4G provides an excellent display and a 108MP camera for its price point.

https://yesgadgets.co.ke/samsung-galaxy-m…redmi-note-14-5g/

Samsung Galaxy A26 5G Vs. Samsung Galaxy M35 5G

Here’s a detailed comparison table highlighting the key differences between the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G:

   

Feature Samsung Galaxy A26 5G Samsung Galaxy M35 5G Key Difference
Display 6.7-inch Super AMOLED, 1080 x 2340 pixels (~385 ppi), 120Hz, Gorilla Glass Victus+ 6.6-inch Super AMOLED, 1080 x 2340 pixels (~390 ppi), 120Hz, Gorilla Glass Victus+ Very similar displays; A26 5G is slightly larger, M35 5G has marginally higher pixel density (negligible in real use). Both have excellent AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates and durable glass.
Brightness 1000 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) (Expected) 1000 nits (HBM) Both offer excellent brightness for outdoor visibility. A26 5G might have a slightly higher peak brightness.
Processor Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Both phones are expected to use the same capable mid-range processor, offering similar performance.
RAM 6GB / 8GB 6GB / 8GB / 12GB The M35 5G offers a higher maximum RAM option (12GB), which could be beneficial for heavy multitasking or future-proofing.
Battery Life 5000 mAh 6000 mAh The M35 5G has a significantly larger battery capacity, which should translate to better battery life.
Rear Camera 50MP (Wide, OIS) + 8MP (Ultrawide) + 2MP (Macro) 50MP (Wide, OIS) + 8MP (Ultrawide) + 5MP (Macro) Very similar camera setups. The M35 5G’s 5MP macro lens is likely slightly better than the 2MP on the A26 5G, offering more detail in close-up shots. Both have OIS on the main lens.
Front Camera 13MP 13MP Identical front camera specifications.
Build Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), plastic frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+) Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), plastic frame, glass back Both share a very similar premium-feeling build with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on the front, and glass backs, though the frame is plastic.
Water Resistance IP67 Unspecified (Likely similar to M34, which was IP67 or similar, though not explicitly stated for M35 in all sources) The A26 5G is expected to have an IP67 rating, offering dust and water resistance. While the M35 5G’s rating isn’t always explicitly listed, it’s a feature present in similar Samsung mid-rangers.
S Pen No No Neither phone includes S Pen support.
Software Android 15, One UI 7 (Expected) Android 14, One UI 6.1 (Out of box) The A26 5G is expected to launch with a newer Android version (Android 15) and One UI (7). Both Samsung phones receive good software support, but the A26 5G starts with a later version.
Charging 25W wired 25W wired Both offer similar 25W wired fast charging.
Special Features IP67 rating, Stereo Speakers, Dolby Atmos, Up to 6 generations Android upgrades, Gorilla Glass Victus+ on front and back Stereo Speakers, Dolby Atmos, Vapour Cooling Chamber (first in M-series), Gorilla Glass Victus+ on front Both offer stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos. The A26 5G is rumored to have Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both front and back. The M35 5G highlights a “Vapour Cooling Chamber” for better sustained performance, a good addition for the M-series.
Price (Launch) KES 29,300.00 – KSh 34,800 KES 21,200 (approx. depending on RAM/storage variant and retailer) The M35 5G is already available and generally sits in a slightly lower price bracket compared to the rumored A26 5G launch price, offering potentially better value on paper due to its larger battery.

My Choice and Why:

For users looking for a significantly larger battery life and a slightly more capable macro camera, the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G stands out. Its 6000 mAh battery is a key differentiator, making it ideal for heavy users or those who prioritize extended usage between charges. The inclusion of a Vapour Cooling Chamber also suggests better thermal management for sustained performance. It’s also already available, often at a competitive price.

The Samsung Galaxy A26 5G, on the other hand, is expected to offer a newer Android version out of the box and potentially slightly more robust build with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both sides (though the M35 also has it on the front). If you prioritize having the absolute latest software from day one and slightly better (rumored) build materials, and don’t mind the standard 5000 mAh battery, the A26 5G could be a strong contender upon its release.

Overall Recommendation:

* Choose the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G if: You prioritize maximum battery life, want a phone that’s currently available, and appreciate features like the vapor cooling chamber for sustained performance, all at a competitive price.
* Choose the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G if: You prefer having the absolute latest Android version and One UI out of the box, and potentially a slightly more durable build (if the dual Victus+ rumor holds true for the back as well), and a 5000 mAh battery is sufficient for your needs.
Given that you are looking for mid-range phones, both of these fit the bill well. The M35 5G seems to offer a slightly more compelling package in terms of battery life, which is a common priority in the mid-range segment.

https://yesgadgets.co.ke/samsung-galaxy-a…ng-galaxy-m35-5g/

Samsung Galaxy A16 Vs. Redmi 13

Here’s the comparison table highlighting the key differences between the Samsung Galaxy A16 and the Redmi 13:

     

Feature Samsung Galaxy A16 Redmi 13 Key Difference
Display Expected: 6.6-inch PLS LCD, HD+ Expected: 6.6-inch IPS LCD, FHD+ Redmi 13 likely to have a sharper display.
Processor Expected: MediaTek Helio G85 Expected: MediaTek Helio G88 Redmi 13 likely to have a slightly more powerful processor.
RAM Expected: 4GB / 6GB Expected: 4GB / 6GB / 8GB Redmi 13 likely to offer a higher maximum RAM option.
Battery Life Expected: 5000 mAh Expected: 5000 mAh Similar battery capacity expected.
Rear Camera Expected: 50MP (Main) + Others Expected: 50MP (Main) + Others Similar main camera resolution expected.
Front Camera Expected: 13MP Expected: 8MP / 13MP (depending on info) Potential variation in front camera resolution.
Build Likely Plastic Back and Frame Likely Plastic Back and Frame Similar build materials expected.
Water Resistance Not Specified Not Specified Water resistance is unlikely for both.
Software Android (Samsung One UI) Android (Xiaomi MIUI) Different user interfaces.
Charging Expected: Standard Charging Support Expected: Fast Charging Support Redmi 13 likely to have faster charging.
Special Features Varies (Samsung ecosystem features) Varies (Xiaomi specific features) Different brand-specific features.
Price KES 17,800 – KSh 23,000 KES 16,700 – KSh 19,350 Price comparison will depend on official pricing.

My Choice and Why:

Based on typical specifications for their respective budget series, the Redmi 13 is likely to offer a sharper display (FHD+ vs. HD+), a slightly more powerful processor, and potentially faster charging compared to the Samsung Galaxy A16. It might also offer a higher maximum RAM configuration.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 might appeal to users who prefer Samsung’s One UI and its ecosystem of features.

I’d say: If you prioritize a sharper display and faster charging, the Redmi 13 seems like it might offer more value on paper. However, if you prefer the Samsung user experience, the Galaxy A16 could be your choice. We’ll need official specifications and pricing for both to make a definitive recommendation.

https://yesgadgets.co.ke/samsung-galaxy-a…-help-you-decide/

Google Pixel 7 Pro Vs. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Vs. Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G

Here’s a detailed comparison table highlighting the key differences between the Google Pixel 7 Pro, the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G, and the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G:

Feature Google Pixel 7 Pro Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Key Difference
Display 6.7-inch LTPO OLED, 1440 x 3120 pixels (~512 ppi), 120Hz 6.6-inch Super AMOLED, 1080 x 2340 pixels (~390 ppi), 120Hz 6.67-inch AMOLED, 1220 x 2712 pixels (~446 ppi), 120Hz Pixel 7 Pro has the sharpest display with adaptive refresh rate. Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G has a sharper display than Galaxy A55 5G.
Brightness 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) 1000 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G is expected to have the brightest display.
Processor Google Tensor G2 Samsung Exynos 1480 MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ Ultra Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G is expected to have the most powerful processor, followed by Pixel 7 Pro, then Galaxy A55 5G.
RAM 8GB / 12GB 8GB / 12GB 8GB / 12GB / 16GB Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G offers a higher maximum RAM option.
Battery Life 5000 mAh 5000 mAh 5000 mAh (expected) Similar battery capacities. Real-world performance will vary based on software and usage.
Rear Camera 50MP (Wide, OIS) + 12MP (Ultrawide) + 48MP (Telephoto, OIS, 5x optical zoom) 50MP (Wide, OIS) + 12MP (Ultrawide) + 5MP (Macro) 200MP (Wide, OIS) + 8MP (Ultrawide) + 2MP (Macro) Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G has a significantly higher resolution main camera. Pixel 7 Pro offers a dedicated telephoto lens with substantial optical zoom.
Front Camera 10.8MP 32MP 32MP / 50MP (depending on source) Galaxy A55 5G and Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G are expected to have higher resolution front cameras.
Build Glass back, aluminum frame, IP68 Glass back, aluminum frame, IP67 Glass or Leather back, Aluminum frame, IP68 Pixel 7 Pro and Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G offer better dust and water resistance. Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G might have a more premium back material option.
Water Resistance IP68 IP67 IP68 Pixel 7 Pro and Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G have better water and dust resistance.
Software Android 14 Android 14, One UI 6.1 Android 14, HyperOS Different user interfaces with varying update policies. Pixel offers a cleaner, stock Android experience with timely updates.
Charging 23W wired, 23W wireless 25W wired 120W wired (expected) Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G is expected to have significantly faster wired charging.
Special Features Tensor G2 chip (AI, computational photography), excellent cameras, clean Android, timely updates Knox Security, microSD card slot (market dependent) Ultra-fast charging, potentially IR Blaster Pixel 7 Pro excels in camera capabilities and AI features. Galaxy A55 5G offers expandable storage in some markets. Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G focuses on fast charging.
Price KES 54,000 – 56,000 KES 38,000 48,500 KES 48,500 – 50,500 Pixel 7 Pro is the most premium and likely the most expensive. Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G is expected to be competitively priced.

My Choice and Why:

* For users who prioritize camera quality, AI features and a clean, timely updated Android experience, the Google Pixel 7 Pro remains a top contender, despite its higher price point. Its computational photography capabilities and unique software features are significant advantages.
* For users seeking a balance of features with a familiar Samsung experience, a good display and potentially expandable storage, the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G is a solid mid-range option. It offers a reliable performance and a well-established ecosystem.
* For users who prioritize raw performance, a high-resolution camera, significantly fast charging and a potentially more premium build at a competitive price, the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G appears to be a very compelling option. Its expected specifications indicate a focus on delivering high-end features without the flagship price tag.

I’d say: If camera and software are paramount, go for the Pixel 7 Pro. If you prefer the Samsung ecosystem and a good all-around experience, the Galaxy A55 5G is a good choice. However, if you’re looking for the best possible performance and charging speed for your money, the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G is shaping up to be a strong contender. Keep an eye on its official release and pricing in Kenya!

https://yesgadgets.co.ke/google-pixel-7-p…-help-you-decide/

SHOPPING CART

close